<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Killer Otaku Robots &#187; Techie Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://killerotakurobots.com/category/techie-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://killerotakurobots.com</link>
	<description>Just another CustomPC.TV Network site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Killer Otaku Robots Episode One</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/the-real-killer-otaku-robots-episode-one/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/the-real-killer-otaku-robots-episode-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K.O.R. Episodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[K.O.R. Ep ONE iPod 640&#215;480 Version K.O.R. Ep ONE High Quality Version Yep, it&#8217;s finally here. Episode one. It&#8217;s late, I&#8217;m tired, and after three LONG days of encoding (well more swearing at a P.O.C. program as it crashes for the millionth time), the episode is finally done. that last ep 1 didn&#8217;t count. neither [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="" /><br />
<a href="http:///killerotakurobots.com/KOREPS/Untitled.mp4">K.O.R. Ep ONE iPod 640&#215;480 Version</a><br />
<a href="http:///killerotakurobots.com/KOREPS/Untitled.wmv">K.O.R. Ep ONE High Quality Version</a></p>
<p>Yep, it&#8217;s finally here. Episode one. It&#8217;s late, I&#8217;m tired, and after three LONG days of encoding (well more swearing at a P.O.C. program as it crashes for the millionth time), the episode is finally done.<br />
that last ep 1 didn&#8217;t count. neither did the one before that. hell this one probably won&#8217;t count a year from now but I DON&#8217;T CARE!!!</p>
<p>This episode we went to Animethon 16 and Fragaplooza 2009 which so happened to be on at the same time in two different cities (well kinda). We still found a way to go to both. Here we talk about our exploits in this grandiose adventure.</p>
<p>Click below to see the show notes&#8230; (unless you&#8217;re viewing the full article&#8230; then ignore this)<span id="more-386"></span></p>
<p>First off there are the websites for the two events, both of which are in need of volunteers.</p>
<p><a href="http://animethon.org/" target="_blank">Animethon.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fragapalooza.com" target="_blank">Fragapalooza.com</a></p>
<p>Ok Mentioning the things I seen in <strong>Fragapalooza 2009</strong>&#8230;. yeah sorry but I kinda forgot to write down everyone&#8217;s name so I have no Idea who any of these cool systems belonged too. If any of you see this then drop me an e-mail and I&#8217;ll give you proper credit.</p>
<p>There were a few things that I did remember to keep track of however and I will show that now.</p>
<p><strong>Thermal Electric Cooling</strong> was at the <strong>Gigabyte</strong> booth, but the coolers is made by a company called <strong><a href="http://www.coolitsystems.com/index.php/products/cpu-coolers/135-boreas-mtec-chassis-st.html" target="_blank">CoolIT Systems</a></strong> in Calgary. And yes, I can and I will be building high end machines with these things if anyone is wondering (I as in <strong><a href="http://custompc.ca/contact-us/" target="_blank">CustomPC</a></strong>).</p>
<p>The <strong>BFG-Nvidia</strong> booth was where they had the <strong><a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D_Vision_Main.html" target="_blank">3D gaming setup</a></strong>, this is compatible with some games for the 360 and PS3 but more importantly this is compatible with almost any 3D game for the PC, although only a over hundred are officially supported. However there are a few limitations, inorder to use this technology you must have windows vista or later and have either a 3D compatible HDTV or a 120hz Flat Panel monitor. Also if you are using this on the PC, games require TWICE the gfx power. BFG says at least 1 <strong>GeForce GTX 275</strong> is required for newer games.</p>
<p>The <strong>BFG-Nvidia</strong> booth also had some neat cases from <a href="http://www.dangerden.com/" target="_blank">Danger Den</a>. Unfortunately I cannot affordably get the cases on display in Canada. I haven&#8217;t given up yet though!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=114531728935" target="_blank">Next there&#8217;s the Animethon BBQ information. This is on Facebook only so you require a Facebook account! Click here for that.</a></p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s about it for the show notes&#8230; If I missed something or want to ask anymore questions be sure to leave a comment here.</p>
<p><strong>*EDIT*</strong></p>
<p>the Animethon BBQ has been moved to Coronation Park, on Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 12:00pm &#8211; 5:00pm. This was the e-mail I recived&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Alexandra ﾘｲｻﾁ Chretien sent a message to the members of BBQ at Rundle park.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Subject: Due to unforseen curcumstances</p>
<p>ok so the venue has changed (sorry to do this so close to game time). the new site is coranation park same day same time and at this current second im still working on catering (Fat fraks is too busy) any suggestions or would it just be easier to have a cosplay in the park day need to know asap!!</p>
<p>&lt;3 you all!!!</p>
<p>Lexa and the staff</p>
<p>P.s. coronation park is just behinde the Space and science center!!! will up date map cost if i dont find a caterer will be FREE!!!! but it will be a bring ur own picnic situation.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/the-real-killer-otaku-robots-episode-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://killerotakurobots.com/KOREPS/untitled.flv" length="492815090" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac&#039;s Can Get Viruses too!!!</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/macs-can-get-viruses-too/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/macs-can-get-viruses-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff that pisses me off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another post off of The How To Geek that I believe should be shared with everyone&#8230; &#8220;We&#8217;ve all seen the Mac vs PC ads mocking us, claiming that Macs never get viruses. If that were true, there wouldn&#8217;t be a botnet of infected Macs completely controlled by unknown hackers. Botnet? Infected Macs? What? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another post off of The How To Geek that I believe should be shared with everyone&#8230;</p>
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;We&#8217;ve all seen the Mac vs PC ads mocking us, claiming that Macs never get viruses. If that were true, there wouldn&#8217;t be a botnet of infected Macs completely controlled by unknown hackers.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.howtogeek.com/geekers/up/Sick-Mac.png" alt="Sick Mac Computer" width="300" height="268" /></p>
<p><strong>Botnet? Infected Macs? What?</strong></p>
<p>Security researchers at Symantec <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3157">recently discovered</a> a group of thousands of Mac OS X computers infected with a Trojan horse application embedded in pirated copies of iWork 09.</p>
<p>The infected users had installed the software without scanning it for viruses, no doubt in part because of Apple&#8217;s commercials implying that Mac users don&#8217;t need to worry about security.</p>
<p>Once the hacker managed to get his malware installed on these zombie Mac computers, the entire group was fully under his control &#8211; and he <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=3745">began to use them to attack web sites</a>, but they could be used for other, more nefarious purposes: like sending spam!<br />
<span id="more-355"></span><br />
<strong>Wait, a Mac can get a virus?</strong></p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly right: no operating system is immune to viruses, worms, Trojans, or even spyware. To be fair, the vast majority of all malware targets Windows users, especially unpatched and horribly insecure Windows XP machines &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t mean other platforms can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t get viruses, especially as Apple gains market share and attracts the notice of the hackers.</p>
<p>My problem with this whole story is that Mac users should be educated &#8211; you simply cannot download software from BitTorrent and start using it without doing a virus scan first, and Apple should stop mocking security in their commercials.</p>
<p><strong>But this Hack Required User Intervention, it&#8217;s Not Apple&#8217;s Fault!</strong></p>
<p>That&#8217;s quite true! This problem was caused by users downloading software illegally, entering their admin password, and installing it by choice. Hardly Apple&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>But… this is part of a broader issue: Lying about security features will not keep the hackers away! Apple needs to take security more seriously, or else they will run into the same problem that Microsoft did with Windows XP: massive virus/worm infections across the board, and millions of zombie computers sending us spam.</p>
<p>Case in point: last month, a couple of hackers were able to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2917">crack a fully patched MacBook in a few seconds</a>, requiring nothing more than clicking on a link using the built-in Safari web browser. If Mac users are conditioned into thinking that they don&#8217;t need to worry about security, these types of attacks could escalate in the future.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time to recommend security software to Mac users?&#8221;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/the-geek-blog/week-in-geek-the-macs-have-viruses-too-edition/" target="_blank">How To Geek</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/macs-can-get-viruses-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Windows Tweaks</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/bad-windows-tweaks/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/bad-windows-tweaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff that pisses me off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was an awesone blog from Lifehacker&#8217;s How-To Geek, and I thought I should share with you guys&#8230; As a tech writer, one of my biggest pet peeves is the plethora of bad advice littered across almost every web site dedicated to system tweaking. Besides the tweaks that simply don&#8217;t work, some of them will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This was an awesone blog from <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/357013594/debunking-common-windows-performance-tweaking-myths">Lifehacker&#8217;s How-To Geek</a>, and I thought I should share with you guys&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.lifehacker.com/assets/resources/2008/08/debunkingwindowsmyths-header.png" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="180" align="left" /><br />
As a tech writer, one of my biggest pet peeves is the plethora of bad advice littered across almost every web site dedicated to system tweaking. Besides the tweaks that simply don&#8217;t work, some of them will actually cause your computer to run even slower—or worse. Let&#8217;s examine some of the most offensive myths out there regarding PC performance tweaking, and debunk them once and for all.</p>
<p><span id="more-176"></span></p>
<h3>Disabling QoS to Free Up 20% of Bandwidth</h3>
<p>This tip made the rounds with people believing that Microsoft always allocates 20% of your bandwidth for Windows Update. According to the instructions, you were supposed to disable QoS in order to free up bandwidth. Unfortunately this tip was not only wrong, but disabling QoS will cause problems with applications that rely on it, like some streaming media or VoIP applications.</p>
<p>Rather than taking my word for it, you can read the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316666">official Microsoft response</a>: <em>&#8220;There have been claims in various published technical articles and newsgroup postings that Windows XP always reserves 20 percent of the available bandwidth for QoS. These claims are incorrect&#8230; One hundred percent of the network bandwidth is available to be shared by all programs unless a program specifically requests priority bandwidth.&#8221;</em></p>
<h3>Make Vista Use Multiple Cores to Speed Up Boot Time</h3>
<p><img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/boot_option.jpg" alt="boot_option.jpg" width="179" height="111" align="right" />This bogus tip made the rounds recently and almost everybody got caught including <a href="http://lifehacker.com/396904/make-vista-use-multiple-cores-to-speed-boot-time">Lifehacker</a> and big brother site <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5019215/how-to-make-windows-vista-boot-faster-with-multiple-cores">Gizmodo</a>&#8230; although commenters called it out quickly on both sides, and the editors updated the posts. (That&#8217;s yet another reason to always participate in the comments here.)</p>
<p>According to this tip, you were supposed to use MS Config to modify the &#8220;Number of processors&#8221; drop-down on the Boot tab. The problem is that this setting is only used for troubleshooting and debugging, to be able to determine if there is a problem with a single processor, or for a programmer to test their code against a single core while running on a multi-core system. Windows will use all your processors by default without this setting.</p>
<h3>Clearing Out Windows Prefetch for Faster Startup</h3>
<p>The Prefetch feature in Windows XP caches parts of applications that you frequently use and tries to optimize the loading process to speed up application start time, so when a number of sites started suggesting that you clean it out regularly to speed up boot time it seemed like good advice&#8230; but sadly that&#8217;s not the case, as pointed out by <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/windows/tweak-windows-prefetch-for-a-faster-startup-201453.php">many Lifehacker commenters</a>.</p>
<p>The Prefetch feature is actually used as a sort of index, to tell Windows which parts of an application should be loaded into memory in which order to speed up application load time, but Windows doesn&#8217;t use the information unless it&#8217;s actually starting an application. There&#8217;s also a limit of 128 files that can be stored in the prefetch folder at any point, and Windows cleans out the folder automatically, removing information for applications that haven&#8217;t been run as frequently. Not only that, but a well-written defrag utility will use the prefetch information to optimize the position of the files on the disk, speeding up access even further.</p>
<p>Windows expert <a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=743">Ed Bott explains it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The .pf files don’t get used at all until you run a program. What actually happens when you click an icon is that Windows uses the information in the Prefetch folder to decide which program segments to load and in what order to load those pages.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Cleaning the Registry Improves Performance</h3>
<p><img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2008/08/debunking6.png" alt="" width="494" height="133" /><br />
The Windows registry is a massive database of almost every setting imaginable for every application on your system. It only makes sense that cleaning it out would improve performance, right? Sadly it&#8217;s just a marketing gimmick designed to sell registry cleaner products, as the reality is quite different&#8230; registry cleaners only remove a very small number of unused keys, which won&#8217;t help performance when you consider the hundreds of thousands of keys in the registry.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t to say they are completely useless, of course. I&#8217;d still recommend cleaning the registry when you are trying to troubleshoot a problem caused by uninstalling buggy software that leaves entries behind, but even then you should be very careful to use a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/397792/five-best-windows-maintenance-tools">reputable application</a> like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/384990/ccleaner-20-decrapifies-your-pc">previously mentioned CCleaner</a> and review the entries before deleting anything.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=643">Ed Bott weighs in</a> with a stronger opinion:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’d go a step further: Don’t run registry cleaner programs, period. I won’t go so far as to call them snake oil, but what possible performance benefits can you get from “cleaning up” unneeded registry entries and eliminating a few stray DLL files?</p></blockquote>
<h3>Clear Memory by Processing Idle Tasks</h3>
<p>By this point you should be starting to get the picture&#8230; if something sounds too good to be true, it likely is. This well-traveled tip usually claims that you can create an &#8220;undocumented&#8221; shortcut to Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks that will clear out memory by processing all of the idle tasks wasting memory in the background.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the problem? Those idle tasks aren&#8217;t actually waiting in the background&#8230; what you are effectively doing is telling the computer that you&#8217;ve walked away so it can now do other processing while you are idle. Except you aren&#8217;t. The real purpose of this functionality is to finish all processing before running benchmarks to ensure consistent times, and according to the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/benchmark.mspx#E3E">Microsoft documentation</a> there&#8217;s a whole different story:</p>
<blockquote><p>When called from the command line, the ProcessIdleTasks work is done in the background asynchronously. It can take 10 to 15 minutes for idle tasks to complete. Task Manager will report processes running, and the disk will likely be active during this time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more at The Life of a Techno-Guru blog in a post called <a href="http://develnet.blogspot.com/2006/12/response-to-digg-article-claiming-to.html">Response to Digg Article Claiming to Free up Memory</a>.</p>
<h3>Clean, Defrag and Boost Your RAM With SnakeOil Memory Optimizer</h3>
<p><img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2008/08/debunking2.png" alt="" width="219" height="153" align="right" />Just take a quick look at any download site, and you&#8217;ll find hundreds of products that claim to &#8220;optimize RAM to make your computer run faster&#8221;. Give me a break! Almost all of these products do the same things: they call a <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682606.aspx">Windows API function</a> that forces applications to write out their memory to the pagefile, or they allocate and then deallocate a ton of memory quickly so that Windows will be forced to page everything else.</p>
<p>Both of the techniques make it appear that you&#8217;ve suddenly freed up memory, when in reality all you&#8217;ve done is trade in your blazing fast RAM for a much slower hard drive. Once you have to switch back to an application that has been moved to the pagefile, it&#8217;ll be so slow you&#8217;ll be likely to go all <em>Office Space</em> on your machine.</p>
<p>Windows expert <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich">Mark Russinovich</a> <a href="http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/41095/the-memory-optimization-hoax.html">agrees</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>At best, RAM optimizers have no effect, and at worst, they seriously degrade performance.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Disabling Shadow Copy/System Restore Improves Performance</h3>
<p><img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2008/08/debunking3.png" alt="" width="269" height="164" align="right" />I&#8217;ve barely come across a Windows Vista tips site that doesn&#8217;t tell you to disable System Restore to speed up performance, because it takes up to 15% of your hard drive by default, which sounds like good advice. Except it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>The reality is that System Restore only actually kicks in when you are installing updates or applications, or at <a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/change-how-often-system-restore-creates-restore-points-in-windows-vista/">pre-scheduled times in the day</a>, and the automatic checkpoints will only happen when your computer is not being used. These checkpoints allow you to easily roll back your system to a pre-crash state, and I can tell you from experience that System Restore is a critical feature when your Vista machine has problems, allowing you to easily get back to a working state.</p>
<p>Instead of disabling System Restore to free up space, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=243">Ed Bott suggests</a> that you simply use Disk Cleanup to remove all but the most recent restore point. (Under the More Options tab, you&#8217;ll find a Clean up button).</p>
<h3>Enable SuperFetch in Windows XP</h3>
<p><img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2008/08/debunking7.png" alt="" width="235" height="121" align="right" />Somebody decided to start spreading the myth that you could enable SuperFetch in Windows XP by adding the same EnableSuperfetch key into the registry that Windows Vista has, and it spread like wildfire. Naturally, this tip was completely bogus.</p>
<p>The good news is that this tip is one of the few that will not harm your system in any way, as long as you don&#8217;t break something while editing the registry. If you insist on using it, I won&#8217;t complain.</p>
<p>If you want some proof, you can use the <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897439.aspx">strings.exe</a> utility to see that &#8220;superfetch&#8221; doesn&#8217;t exist anywhere in the XP kernel, or you can believe Ed Bott and Mark Russinovich, who have <a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000863.html">already debunked this myth</a>.</p>
<h3>Disabling Services to Speed Up the Computer</h3>
<p>Perhaps the most common myth is the advice to disable all services that you aren&#8217;t using. I realize this will generate some controversy, so let me clarify: Disabling non-essential services that are NOT part of Windows will sometimes yield a performance gain if you have identified those services as causing a problem. You can identify or disable those services by opening msconfig.exe and checking the box for &#8220;Hide all Microsoft services&#8221; on the Services tab:<br />
<img src="http://lifehacker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2008/08/debunking5.png" alt="" width="561" height="316" /></p>
<p>The problem with disabling services is that your devices will often not work once you do: for instance, I disabled the &#8220;Unknown&#8221; dlbt_device service in the list above, and could no longer print to my Dell printer&#8230; disabling the VMware services made VMware unable to run, and so forth.</p>
<p>You should be even more careful to not disable built-in Microsoft services in Windows, except for a select few under certain circumstances:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>SuperFetch</strong>—This caching service preloads applications into memory, and actually does work. The problem is that it can cause your hard drive to do a lot of grinding while it&#8217;s working, which is especially irritating on a laptop.</li>
<li><strong>Windows Search</strong>—If you don&#8217;t use the Vista search or you use an alternate desktop search engine, you really don&#8217;t need this service and can increase performance quite a bit by disabling it.</li>
<li><strong>Windows Defender</strong> &#8211; If you are already using another anti-malware product, you really don&#8217;t need this running as well.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=448&amp;page=3">Ed Bott&#8217;s summary</a> speaks for itself:</p>
<blockquote><p>If someone tries to talk you into disabling a bunch of other services, ask them what you stand to gain. I’ll bet they can’t tell you.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Editor: Readers should note that a recent <a href="http://lifehacker.com/399766/microsofts-advice-on-how-to-speed-up-vista">Windows Vista tweaking guide</a>, offered for download by Microsoft, does suggest disabling unneeded services.</em></p>
<p>When it comes to performance tweaking, a very large amount of testing is required each and every time you make a change. The better option is to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/feature/hack-attack-how-to-install-ram-138665.php"><strong>simply install more RAM</strong></a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/lifehacker-top-10/top-10-ways-to-clean-up-your-pc-294189.php"><strong>clean up your PC</strong></a> if you are having performance problems, and perhaps demand a little more proof before applying secret hacks.</p>
<p><em><strong><a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/">The How-To Geek</a></strong> is a tech writer and geek enthusiast who loves to tinker with hidden settings that actually work. More of his tips and tweaks can be found daily at <a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/">Howtogeek.com</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/bad-windows-tweaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharon Apple, From Sci-Fi to reality.</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/sharon-apple-scifi-to-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/sharon-apple-scifi-to-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OMG WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK While looking up the artist that did this odd, yet catchy song from last week, I discovered something&#8230; IT WAS A ROBOT!!! The voice actress Hatsune Miku is nothing more than a AI designed by Yamaha&#8217;s synth lab. Wow! The reality of there being a Sharron Apple type Artificial Voice actress is here&#8230; To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK While looking up the artist that did <a href="http://killerotakurobots.com/flvplayer.swf?file=http://killerotakurobots.com/KOREPS/SonyRolly.mp4">this odd, yet catchy song from last week,</a> I discovered something&#8230;<br />
<strong>IT WAS A ROBOT!!!</strong> The voice actress <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocaloid">Hatsune Miku</a> is nothing more than a AI designed by Yamaha&#8217;s synth lab. Wow! The reality of there being a Sharron Apple type Artificial Voice actress is here&#8230; To bad Miku kinda sounds like crap. <strong>BUT</strong> This is mealy the beginning. 5 years from now and we won&#8217;t be able to tell the difference. So&#8230; does this mean Japanese Techno will get better or worse???<br />
OMG S.R.W. game music will <em>DEFINITELY</em> get worse!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a few vids I sorted through that didn&#8217;t completely suck&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDyUqvp7Uak">vid 1 the source of the vid above</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbbA9BhCTko">vid 2 the song on the dancing MP3 player</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIeIk695jxI">vid 3 lol totoro</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/sharon-apple-scifi-to-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook plugin for PIDGIN!!</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/facebook4pidgin/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/facebook4pidgin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woot! Now I don&#8217;t have to browse FaceSUCK in order to chat with my many friends who don&#8217;t use msn!! here&#8217;s the Pidgin plugin for Facebook Chat This plugin is free and works with any version of Pidgin regardless of OS]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="pidgin-facebook-chat.png" src="http://www.lifehacker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/pidgin-facebook-chat.png" width="203" height="188" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2">Woot! Now I don&#8217;t have to browse FaceSUCK in order to chat with my many friends who don&#8217;t use msn!! here&#8217;s the Pidgin plugin for <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-facebookchat/">Facebook Chat</a></p>
<p>This plugin is free and works with any version of Pidgin regardless of OS </p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/facebook4pidgin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOL Cheep RAID for Notebooks</title>
		<link>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/lol-cheep-raid-for-notebooks/</link>
		<comments>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/lol-cheep-raid-for-notebooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint Theriault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://killerotakurobots.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#8217;s kinda cheating but regardless it&#8217;s an awesome solution (if only I could rig this up to work with my PSP) Using this device (2 card on top one on the bottom) you can set up 3 Compact flash drives as a standard 2.5&#8243; SATA hard drive and use it for your laptop. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s kinda cheating but regardless it&#8217;s an awesome solution (if only I could rig this up to work with my PSP)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://killerotakurobots.com/wp-content/uploads/admin/2008/04/diy_ssd_1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-93" src="http://killerotakurobots.com/wp-content/uploads/admin/2008/04/diy_ssd_1-300x293.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="293" /></a><br />
<br />
Using this device (2 card on top one on the bottom) you can set up 3 Compact flash drives as a standard 2.5&#8243; SATA hard drive and use it for your laptop. They also claim this device even supports RAID 5!! Considering how expensive a conventional SSD this is a wicked alternative.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-15886-DIY+SSD+upgraded+by+Century.html" target="_blank">Akihabara News</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://killerotakurobots.com/news/lol-cheep-raid-for-notebooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

